Week 4 Reading Reflection
1) What was the biggest surprise for you
in the reading? In other words, what did you read that stood out the most as
different from your expectations?
- While Kuratko was
defining nine methods to develop creativity, the ninth method was
surprising. "Remembering your wildest dreams". Elias Howe
invented the sewing machine. His idea came to him in his dreams. The dream
he had were cannibals piercing his flesh with spears. How crazy is that? He
took what seemed like a nightmare, and used his creativity to turn it into
an invention.
2) Identify at least one part of the
reading that was confusing to you.
·
“For
creativity to occur, chaos is a necessary-but a structured and focused chaos.”
(157, Kuratko) I wasn’t sure what Kuratko meant by this. Usually chaos is
associated in a negative way. Did he just mean, “out of the ordinary”? In a
positive viewpoint, it could be explained as an overwhelmed flux of ideas. Why
would chaos be necessary?
3) If you were able to ask
two questions to the author, what would you ask? Why?
·
How
would Patents work for a duplication in innovative products or ideas? A
creative replication of an existing concept? As long as no one else thought of
it, how do you patent an “additional” idea? I thought of asking these
questions, because there are so many methods used to develop creativity. You
need to be able to protect your idea.
·
While
performing the creative exercise, I found it difficult to find functions for an
‘egotistical staff member’ and the ‘office tightwad’. These two items on the
list were the most negative. What would the author list as functions for these?
I would like to know his opinion and viewpoint on this.
4) Was there anything you think the
author was wrong about? Where do you disagree with what she or he said? How?
·
The one thing
that I didn’t agree with the author was “idea killers”. This may hinder some
people’s creative processes. However, I think it depends on the person’s
outlook. It can have some positive influence on others. It can act as a drive
force. Such as, if someone says you can’t do something, they do it to prove
them wrong. Therefore, these so called “idea killers” can push for a driving
force in innovation.





